Predictive Safety in Embodied AI
From Control-Theoretic Filters to Foundation Models
- 1University College London
- 2Holistic AI
Structured review · 10 September 2026
Predicting an unsafe future is useful only if the prediction supports a timely and effective intervention. We compare control-theoretic filters, constrained learning, world models, and vision-language-action policies through their safety properties, assumptions, and evaluation evidence. Predictive capability alone does not establish physical safety.
All 288 candidates have an assessment: 26 full-text inspections and 262 additional AI-assisted readings of supplied abstracts. The search is purposive, not exhaustive. Abstract judgments, full-text evidence and historical keyword tags are kept separate.
The predictive-safety loop
An auditable candidate collection
A continuous line of research
Coverage of the full collection
Comparison tables
The manuscript provides native tables comparing related reviews, all 17 inspected methods and predictive architectures, benchmark capabilities, and research directions. Each technical comparison includes source citations. Read the tables in the paper.
Explore the candidate collection
Search titles or assessment text; use high, medium or low to find full-text priorities. Expand a paper to read its abstract assessment. These AI-assisted judgments await author validation and do not establish a safety guarantee.
Citation and materials
Read the paper · Download candidate metadata · Code, protocol, and evidence
@misc{dacosta2026predictivesafety,
title={Predictive Safety in Embodied AI: From Control-Theoretic Filters to Foundation Models},
author={da Costa, Kleyton and Koshiyama, Adriano and Kanoulas, Dimitrios and Treleaven, Philip},
year={2026}
}